[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Bug-GnuCOBOL] [Bugs] Support for

From: J Leslie Turriff
Subject: Re: [Bug-GnuCOBOL] [Bugs] Support for
Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2018 14:00:12 -0500
User-agent: KMail/1.9.10

On 2018-07-02 16:42:37 Simon Sobisch wrote:
> The second easiest option is to simply drop the "DATE FORMAT YY" part.
> This is something a preprocessor can easily do.
> The easiest option to get a clean compile is hacking GnuCOBOL to accept
> and flag this option as "ignored". I could do this within a day and it
> is likely a good thing in general.
> Any opinions about doing this?
        Without knowing why this method is being used to acquire the date, that 
produce different results than the original compiler (I presume Enterprise 
COBOL) would.  Probably just ignoring this will be innocuous, but that 
depends on the format of the  ACCEPT statement used to get the date into 


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]