[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[bug-gnulib] Re: size_max
From: |
Simon Josefsson |
Subject: |
[bug-gnulib] Re: size_max |
Date: |
Fri, 21 Jan 2005 10:46:46 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110003 (No Gnus v0.3) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
Paul Eggert <address@hidden> writes:
> Simon Josefsson <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> +Include:
>
> Instead of being empty, shouldn't the Include: section look like this?
> Otherwise, SIZE_MAX won't be defined on some platforms.
>
> #include <limits.h>
> #if HAVE_STDINT_H
> #include <stdint.h>
> #endif
>
> Admittedly this is a bit of a hassle. Perhaps we should add
> a new file lib/size_max.h that contains the above code?
I think that would be cleaner.
>> +License:
>> +LGPL
>
> There's no LGPL'ed code in the proposed module. It's licensed under
> these terms:
>
> This file is free software; the Free Software Foundation
> gives unlimited permission to copy and/or distribute it,
> with or without modifications, as long as this notice is preserved.
>
> How about if we change the "License:" field to read "Preserve-notice",
> or something nice little phrase like that?
Would work, if gnulib-tool is modified, it currently look for "LGPL".
> Or, if we add a new file lib/size_max.h along the lines suggested
> above, then perhaps we can just keep it LGPLed. That might be simpler
> than adding a new value to the License: field.
Yes.
>> +Maintainer:
>> +Simon Josefsson
>
> Shouldn't Bruno be the maintainer? He wrote all the code.
> (Unless "Maintainer" means "maintainer of the module file" ....)
I don't know what the significance of the Maintainer field is. I
think I may have "adopted" some modules which I didn't write nor know
extensively before too.
- [bug-gnulib] Re: size_max, Simon Josefsson, 2005/01/20
- Re: [bug-gnulib] Re: size_max, Paul Eggert, 2005/01/20
- [bug-gnulib] Re: size_max,
Simon Josefsson <=
- [bug-gnulib] Re: size_max, Simon Josefsson, 2005/01/21
- [bug-gnulib] Re: size_max, Paul Eggert, 2005/01/21
- [bug-gnulib] Re: size_max, Simon Josefsson, 2005/01/21
- Re: [bug-gnulib] Re: size_max, Stepan Kasal, 2005/01/22
- [bug-gnulib] Re: size_max, Simon Josefsson, 2005/01/22