Re: stdbool.m4 bug

[Bruno Haible]

Paul Eggert wrote:
> >   enum { j = false, k = true, l = false * true, m = true * 256 };
> >   ...
> >   return (!a + !b + !c + !d + !e + !f + !g + !h + !i + !j + !k + !l
> >           + !m + !n + !o);
> >
> > You are expecting that j and l evaluate to true?
>
> No, I'm just making sure that every declared value is used, and can be
> an operand of '!'.  The code isn't run; it's only compiled.  Maybe
> there should be a comment....

Ah, I see. Sorry for thinking the test was wrong.

I've added the extra '!', and added a comment, so that I can reuse the same
code in the unit test module stdbool-tests. There the return value matters.

Bruno