[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: proposed stdbool fixes for AIX, HP-UX, and now IRIX
From: |
Paul Eggert |
Subject: |
Re: proposed stdbool fixes for AIX, HP-UX, and now IRIX |
Date: |
Thu, 26 Jan 2006 13:03:22 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) |
Bruno Haible <address@hidden> writes:
> I remember that for several gcc versions, the problems were in the
> stdbool.h file, not in the built-in type. So I propose to continue using
> _Bool in that case, unlike your patch.
Yes, that sounds even nicer. I copied this into coreutils, so now the
two packages are in sync again here. Thanks.
- proposed stdbool fixes for AIX, HP-UX, and now IRIX, Paul Eggert, 2006/01/19
- Re: [bug-gnulib] proposed stdbool fixes for AIX, HP-UX, and now IRIX, Bruno Haible, 2006/01/24
- Re: [bug-gnulib] proposed stdbool fixes for AIX, HP-UX, and now IRIX, Paul Eggert, 2006/01/25
- Re: proposed stdbool fixes for AIX, HP-UX, and now IRIX, Bruno Haible, 2006/01/25
- Re: proposed stdbool fixes for AIX, HP-UX, and now IRIX, Paul Eggert, 2006/01/25
- Re: proposed stdbool fixes for AIX, HP-UX, and now IRIX, Bruno Haible, 2006/01/26
- Re: proposed stdbool fixes for AIX, HP-UX, and now IRIX,
Paul Eggert <=