Re: SSIZE_MAX

[Paul Eggert]

Ben Pfaff <address@hidden> writes:

> I really meant ssize_max.h, analogous to size_max.h.  Or they
> could be combined into one header file.

I think size_max.h is there only because SIZE_MAX is in different
headers on different systems.  Is that also true for SSIZE_MAX?

I don't offhand recall SSIZE_MAX being defined anywhere other than its
standard location <limits.h>.  If so, then we wouldn't need a
ssize_max.h header, and we wouldn't need to overload size_max.h; we
could just tell people to include <limits.h>.