[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Cvs-dev] Re: [Cvs-test-results] Build CVS (TRUNK) failed.
From: |
Paul Eggert |
Subject: |
Re: [Cvs-dev] Re: [Cvs-test-results] Build CVS (TRUNK) failed. |
Date: |
Sun, 11 Jun 2006 21:01:33 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1008 (Gnus v5.10.8) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) |
"Derek R. Price" <address@hidden> writes:
> The current test that checks for the existence of <stdint.h> isn't
> sufficient on SGI when using the compiler in (its default?) C89 mode,
> because the SGI compiler doesn't have fatal #error directives:
If you ignore the warning, does anything break? If not, then
the current solution is OK, albeit annoying. If so, then what
breaks? We can test for that.
Perhaps the simplest way to see what might break would be to inspect
the SGI stdint.h and see what goes wrong in c89 mode.
- Re: [Cvs-dev] Re: [Cvs-test-results] Build CVS (TRUNK) failed., Derek R. Price, 2006/06/11
- Re: [Cvs-dev] Re: [Cvs-test-results] Build CVS (TRUNK) failed.,
Paul Eggert <=
- Re: [Cvs-dev] Re: [Cvs-test-results] Build CVS (TRUNK) failed., Mark D. Baushke, 2006/06/12
- stdint module rewrite (was: Re: Build CVS (TRUNK) failed.), Bruno Haible, 2006/06/13
- Re: stdint module rewrite, Simon Josefsson, 2006/06/13
- Re: stdint module rewrite, Bruno Haible, 2006/06/13
- Re: stdint module rewrite, Simon Josefsson, 2006/06/14
- Re: stdint module rewrite, Bruno Haible, 2006/06/16
- Re: stdint module rewrite, Paul Eggert, 2006/06/13
- Re: stdint module rewrite, Bruno Haible, 2006/06/13