[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [bug-gnulib] inline.m4: use compiler, not cpp
From: |
Bruno Haible |
Subject: |
Re: [bug-gnulib] inline.m4: use compiler, not cpp |
Date: |
Fri, 10 Nov 2006 15:42:51 +0100 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.1 |
Jim Meyering wrote:
> 2006-11-10 Jim Meyering <address@hidden>
>
> * m4/inline.m4 (gl_INLINE): Check with the compiler, not cpp,
> so that relevant options in CFLAGS (like -O, -fno-inline) are
> taken into account.
Thanks again! I applied this patch, with added comments, and without
the quadrigraphs for '#'. (It works with '#' therefore why write '@%:@'?)
> The gl_INLINE macro was failing to define HAVE_INLINE,
> and that led to link errors when building coreutils with CFLAGS=-O.
Hmm. I understand such link errors if, after updating from gnulib, you
did "make" without "make clean". If you got the link errors also after doing
a "make clean; make", there must still be an error somewhere. The HAVE_INLINE
is only a hint. Do you still get a link error when configuring and compiling
with no optimization (CFLAGS empty)?
Bruno
- inline.m4: use compiler, not cpp, Jim Meyering, 2006/11/10
- Re: [bug-gnulib] inline.m4: use compiler, not cpp,
Bruno Haible <=
- Re: inline.m4: use compiler, not cpp, Jim Meyering, 2006/11/10
- Re: inline.m4: use compiler, not cpp, Ralf Wildenhues, 2006/11/10
- missing dependencies [Re: inline.m4: use compiler, not cpp, Jim Meyering, 2006/11/10
- Re: missing dependencies [Re: inline.m4: use compiler, not cpp, Bruno Haible, 2006/11/10
- Re: missing dependencies [Re: inline.m4: use compiler, not cpp, Bruno Haible, 2006/11/13
- Re: missing dependencies [Re: inline.m4: use compiler, not cpp, Jim Meyering, 2006/11/13
- Re: missing dependencies [Re: inline.m4: use compiler, not cpp, Bruno Haible, 2006/11/13
- Re: missing dependencies [Re: inline.m4: use compiler, not cpp, Jim Meyering, 2006/11/14
- Re: missing dependencies, Ralf Wildenhues, 2006/11/14
- Re: missing dependencies, Bruno Haible, 2006/11/13