[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: enforcing the use of string.h related modules
From: |
Bruno Haible |
Subject: |
Re: enforcing the use of string.h related modules |
Date: |
Thu, 1 Feb 2007 01:31:52 +0100 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.5.4 |
Eric Blake wrote:
> > Here is a proposed patch, that leads to a link error if someone
> > uses stpcpy() without the 'stpcpy' module (assuming the 'string' module
> > is present - which is quite likely since so much depends on it).
>
> Sounds like a great idea to me.
OK, thanks for this opinion. There were also no objections, so I apply the
patch.
> I guess the alternative would be making stpcpy.c part of the string module,
> and removing the stpcpy module altogether
Many people would frown upon the lots of code added to their package without
apparent reason. So this option is IMO not viable.
Bruno
- build failures: string.h vs. HP-UX, Jim Meyering, 2007/01/26
- Re: build failures: string.h vs. HP-UX, Bob Proulx, 2007/01/27
- Re: build failures: string.h vs. HP-UX, Jim Meyering, 2007/01/27
- Re: build failures: string.h vs. HP-UX, Jim Meyering, 2007/01/27
- enforcing the use of string.h related modules, Bruno Haible, 2007/01/27
- Re: enforcing the use of string.h related modules, Eric Blake, 2007/01/27
- Re: enforcing the use of string.h related modules,
Bruno Haible <=
- Re: enforcing the use of string.h related modules, Eric Blake, 2007/01/31
- Re: enforcing the use of string.h related modules, Bruno Haible, 2007/01/31
- Re: build failures: string.h vs. HP-UX, Bob Proulx, 2007/01/27
- Re: build failures: string.h vs. HP-UX, Bob Proulx, 2007/01/27
- Re: build failures: string.h vs. HP-UX, Jim Meyering, 2007/01/28
- Re: build failures: string.h vs. HP-UX, Paul Eggert, 2007/01/28
- Re: build failures: string.h vs. HP-UX, Jim Meyering, 2007/01/29
- Re: build failures: string.h vs. HP-UX, Paul Eggert, 2007/01/29
- Re: build failures: string.h vs. HP-UX, Jim Meyering, 2007/01/29
- Re: build failures: string.h vs. HP-UX, Paul Eggert, 2007/01/28