Re: check for C99-compliant snprintf - call for volunteers

[Daniel Jacobowitz]

On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 02:09:01AM +0100, Bruno Haible wrote:
> Using snprintfv seems better for you - there you can redefine each directive's
> execution independently.

Yes - that's exactly my plan :-)

> > Anyway, I'm stalled for a while on snprintfv
> 
> Why? Paolo presented a nice plan [1]. It only needs to be executed.

Sorry, "stalled" may not have been the right word.  I am totally in
support of Paolo's plan, and I began executing it, but a big project
has come up at work - so I'm out of time, for the next couple of
weeks.  I hope that if no one else does sooner, I'll be back to it.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery