[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: yet another snprintf bug

From: Bruno Haible
Subject: Re: yet another snprintf bug
Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 22:47:50 +0200
User-agent: KMail/1.5.4

Eric Blake wrote:
> For strings larger than 1024 bytes, there was a
> separate bug, where the NUL byte would be appended with a buffer overflow

Is it possible to detect this with an autoconf test? Or not, because the
buffer overflow will always hit memory that was not provided by the caller?


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]