[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: *printf %f and uClibc
|
From: |
Bruno Haible |
|
Subject: |
Re: *printf %f and uClibc |
|
Date: |
Sat, 9 Jun 2007 14:05:38 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
KMail/1.5.4 |
Paul Eggert wrote:
> What do the relevant standards say? If memory serves, IEEE-754
> doesn't require accuracy if you ask for more than 17 digits of output.
> That might be an argument for leaving it alone.
Indeed, IEEE-754 section 5.6 specifies it as you say. Therefore I'm inclined
to keep vasnprintf as it is, and relax the tests if __UCLIBC__ is defined.
Bruno