[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: second call: please nail down the license terms of some more modules
From: |
Simon Josefsson |
Subject: |
Re: second call: please nail down the license terms of some more modules |
Date: |
Mon, 06 Aug 2007 16:04:33 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110007 (No Gnus v0.7) Emacs/22.1 (gnu/linux) |
Bruno Haible <address@hidden> writes:
> The week is over. I'm marking the modules that you specified as LGPLv2+.
> Except the tests, because they can be under GPL without problems, since they
> are not installed into libraries.
Thanks!
> Note that the following modules are not yet marked as LGPLv2+. I don't know
> if you intended it like this.
> crypto/arcfour:LGPL
> crypto/arctwo:LGPL
> crypto/hmac-md5:LGPL
> crypto/hmac-sha1:LGPL
> crypto/md5:LGPL
> crypto/rijndael:LGPL
> crypto/sha1:LGPL
What does 'LGPL' mean? v2.1+ or v3.0? The above are/may be needed by
GnuTLS, so I think it would be useful if the remain LGPLv2.1+.
/Simon
- Re: second call: please nail down the license terms of some more modules,
Simon Josefsson <=