[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: mkdir module license
|
From: |
Bruno Haible |
|
Subject: |
Re: mkdir module license |
|
Date: |
Sat, 26 Apr 2008 02:31:53 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
KMail/1.5.4 |
Yoann Vandoorselaere wrote:
> I guess mkdir could use the original malloc implementation, returning an
> error on allocation failure. Or is that a problem?
Sounds ok to me: There is no reason why a system call replacement like mkdir()
should not report its allocation failures through -1/ENOMEM. Care to provide
a patch that is acceptable to Jim?
Bruno
- mkdir module license, Yoann Vandoorselaere, 2008/04/24
- Re: mkdir module license, Bruno Haible, 2008/04/24
- Re: mkdir module license, Yoann Vandoorselaere, 2008/04/24
- Re: mkdir module license,
Bruno Haible <=
- Re: mkdir module license, Yoann Vandoorselaere, 2008/04/28
- Re: mkdir module license, Jim Meyering, 2008/04/28
- Re: mkdir module license, Yoann Vandoorselaere, 2008/04/29
- Re: mkdir module license, Jim Meyering, 2008/04/29
- Re: mkdir module license, Yoann Vandoorselaere, 2008/04/29
- Re: mkdir module license, Jim Meyering, 2008/04/29