[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: test-sigaction vs SA_RESTORER test failure
From: |
Jim Meyering |
Subject: |
Re: test-sigaction vs SA_RESTORER test failure |
Date: |
Tue, 24 Jun 2008 10:24:51 +0200 |
Eric Blake <address@hidden> wrote:
> According to Jim Meyering on 6/23/2008 2:12 AM:
> | 83 ASSERT (old_sa.sa_flags == 0);
> |
> | And the value of old_sa.sa_flags is 0x4000000,
> | which happens to be SA_RESTORER.
>
> Ah. An extension flag, not defined by POSIX. In short, gnulib can't make
> any assumptions about the state of bits outside of what POSIX requires.
> So I'm checking in this; let me know if it fixes the problem.
Thanks. It does fix it.