Re: test-sigaction vs SA_RESTORER test failure

[Jim Meyering]

Eric Blake <address@hidden> wrote:
> According to Jim Meyering on 6/23/2008 2:12 AM:
> |     83    ASSERT (old_sa.sa_flags == 0);
> |
> | And the value of old_sa.sa_flags is 0x4000000,
> | which happens to be SA_RESTORER.
>
> Ah.  An extension flag, not defined by POSIX.  In short, gnulib can't make
> any assumptions about the state of bits outside of what POSIX requires.
> So I'm checking in this; let me know if it fixes the problem.

Thanks.  It does fix it.