[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GNUmakefile and 'make install'
From: |
Ralf Wildenhues |
Subject: |
Re: GNUmakefile and 'make install' |
Date: |
Sat, 19 Jul 2008 00:54:01 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
* Paul Eggert wrote on Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 11:24:21PM CEST:
> Stepping back for a minute: a minor change like a version-number bump
> should not force the system to recompile everything in sight.
Maybe there should be a way that it also should not cause an autotools
rerun?
> Sorry if I'm asking questions you've already answered before, but I'd
> rather have "make install" be read-only in the working directory.
> That's a longstanding tradition I'm loath to overturn.
This is a necessity in some situations (albeit those are likely to start
with a tarball), say, when installing as a different user than compiling
(and neither of both strictly more privileged than the other).
Cheers,
Ralf
- GNUmakefile and 'make install', Eric Blake, 2008/07/18
- Re: GNUmakefile and 'make install', Paul Eggert, 2008/07/18
- Re: GNUmakefile and 'make install', Micah Cowan, 2008/07/18
- Re: GNUmakefile and 'make install', Eric Blake, 2008/07/18
- Re: GNUmakefile and 'make install', Paul Eggert, 2008/07/18
- Re: GNUmakefile and 'make install', Alfred M. Szmidt, 2008/07/18
- Re: GNUmakefile and 'make install', Jim Meyering, 2008/07/18
- Re: GNUmakefile and 'make install',
Ralf Wildenhues <=
- Re: GNUmakefile and 'make install', Eric Blake, 2008/07/21
- Re: GNUmakefile and 'make install', Jim Meyering, 2008/07/21
- Re: GNUmakefile and 'make install', Bruno Haible, 2008/07/21
- Re: GNUmakefile and 'make install', Eric Blake, 2008/07/21
- Re: GNUmakefile and 'make install', Alfred M. Szmidt, 2008/07/21
- Re: GNUmakefile and 'make install', Eric Blake, 2008/07/21
- Re: GNUmakefile and 'make install', Alfred M. Szmidt, 2008/07/22
- Re: git-version-gen and 'make install', Bruno Haible, 2008/07/21