[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: multithread CPPFLAGS

From: Ralf Wildenhues
Subject: Re: multithread CPPFLAGS
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 10:15:51 +0200
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)


* Matthew Woehlke wrote on Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 07:40:07PM CEST:
> Bruno Haible wrote:
>> Yoann Vandoorselaere wrote:
>>>>   - it does not need to see a thread-aware errno,
>>>> hence it does not need to compile with THREADCPPFLAGS.
>>> Not using a thread-aware errno from an application that indirectly use
>>> thread through a library (which use thread-aware errno). Are you
>>> completely sure this is safe?
>> Instead of discussing whether I'm "completely sure" and what we can "assume",
>> can you show a test program that decides the question without any doubt?
> No, because such a test program would have to be run on all supported  
> porting targets to confirm that there is no problem

The logic is wrong here: All that is desired is a confirmation that there
exists *one* target where there is a problem.  Then it is clear that the
problem needs to be addressed.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]