[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bitrotate
From: |
Ben Pfaff |
Subject: |
Re: bitrotate |
Date: |
Thu, 04 Sep 2008 16:48:54 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) |
Paul Eggert <address@hidden> writes:
> One other thing: if memory serves, the C standard does not require the
> existence of uint32_t and uint16_t (this is for portability to 36-bit
> hosts, I expect); this can easily be worked around by using #ifdef
> UINT32_MAX and #ifdef UINT16_MAX.
For what it's worth: C99 doesn't require uint16_t or uint32_t,
but SUSv3 does.
--
Ben Pfaff
http://benpfaff.org
- Re: bitrotate, (continued)
- Re: bitrotate, Bruno Haible, 2008/09/01
- Re: bitrotate, Simon Josefsson, 2008/09/01
- Re: bitrotate, Simon Josefsson, 2008/09/01
- Re: bitrotate, Ben Pfaff, 2008/09/01
- Re: bitrotate, Bruno Haible, 2008/09/01
- Re: bitrotate, Simon Josefsson, 2008/09/02
- Re: bitrotate, Eric Blake, 2008/09/02
- Re: bitrotate, Simon Josefsson, 2008/09/02
Re: bitrotate, Paul Eggert, 2008/09/04
- Re: bitrotate,
Ben Pfaff <=
- Re: bitrotate, Simon Josefsson, 2008/09/08