[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: gnulib-tool and autoreconf
From: |
Ralf Wildenhues |
Subject: |
Re: gnulib-tool and autoreconf |
Date: |
Sun, 7 Dec 2008 19:25:47 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
Hi Bruno,
* Bruno Haible wrote on Sun, Dec 07, 2008 at 05:33:38PM CET:
> > > It would seem odd to have 'autoreconf' invoke 'gnulib-tool'. gnulib-tool
> > > is a tool that *fetches* source files, whereas autoreconf is a tool that
> > > *combines* source files, generating additional files from them.
> > > Therefore gnulib-tool logically belongs before autoreconf.
[...]
> > So I don't really see the principal difference.
>
> There are two differences between gnulib-tool and the files that are
> installed by aclocal / automake:
> - gnulib-tool does not make releases, therefore one cannot
> assume that gnulib-tool is installed in a standard location,
> - gnulib-tool changes rapidly, therefore re-executing gnulib-tool
> may require subsequent work from the developer. This is not the
> case with automake, because the files imported by automake have
> an essentially stable contract.
> For both reasons, it is not advisable that autoreconf runs gnulib-tool.
Thanks for the rationale, that sounds quite reasonable.
Cheers,
Ralf