[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: mem*/strr*/etc... obsolete warnings
From: |
Mike Frysinger |
Subject: |
Re: mem*/strr*/etc... obsolete warnings |
Date: |
Wed, 28 Jan 2009 14:26:42 -0500 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.10.4 (Linux/2.6.28; KDE/4.1.4; x86_64; ; ) |
On Wednesday 28 January 2009 05:02:37 Bruno Haible wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > i mean something simple like this (and the output from gnulib-tool still
> > looks sane to me):
> > --- a/modules/memcpy
> > +++ b/modules/memcpy
> > @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ Status:
> > obsolete
> >
> > Notice:
> > -This module is obsolete.
> > +This module is obsolete (see gnulib.info::Obsolete modules).
> >
> > Files:
> > lib/memcpy.c
>
> IMO that is excess verbosity. People have to learn by themselves that they
> can look into the documentation.
i disagree, but you're the boss ;)
> I'm not opposed to links into the doc in
> general, and if the output would be in HTML
> <a href="gnulib.html#Obsolete-modules">obsolete</a>
> I would in favour of it. But for plain-text output, it's too verbose.
is this linking generated automatically now ? or does something else need to
happen first ?
thanks for the doc updates!
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
- mem*/strr*/etc... obsolete warnings, Mike Frysinger, 2009/01/04
- Re: mem*/strr*/etc... obsolete warnings, Bruno Haible, 2009/01/17
- Re: mem*/strr*/etc... obsolete warnings, Mike Frysinger, 2009/01/18
- Re: mem*/strr*/etc... obsolete warnings, Bruno Haible, 2009/01/24
- Re: mem*/strr*/etc... obsolete warnings, Mike Frysinger, 2009/01/27
- Re: mem*/strr*/etc... obsolete warnings, Bruno Haible, 2009/01/27
- Re: mem*/strr*/etc... obsolete warnings, Mike Frysinger, 2009/01/27
- Re: mem*/strr*/etc... obsolete warnings, Bruno Haible, 2009/01/28
- Re: mem*/strr*/etc... obsolete warnings,
Mike Frysinger <=