[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: The havelib module
From: |
Sylvain Beucler |
Subject: |
Re: The havelib module |
Date: |
Tue, 10 Feb 2009 00:25:51 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 12:42:33AM +0100, Bruno Haible wrote:
> Sylvain Beucler wrote:
> > > > I got confused because `./configure --help` documents
> > > > '--with-libmylib-prefix', but doesn't mention '--with-mylib'.
>
> If you use AC_LIB_LINKFLAGS, there is no --with[out]-mylib option,
> only a --with[out]-libmylib-prefix option. --without-libmylib-prefix
> instructs the configure file to not make special effort to search
> for libmylib.
>
> If libmylib may or may not be present, you better use
> AC_LIB_HAVE_LINKFLAGS instead of AC_LIB_LINKFLAGS, and provide an
> AC_ARG_WITH([libmylib], ...) by yourself.
Thanks.
Do you think it's worth documenting this use case too?
I think the most common use would be for example:
AC_ARG_WITH(check,
AC_HELP_STRING([--with-check],[Use unit testing]),
[],[with_check=yes])
AC_LIB_HAVE_LINKFLAGS([check],[],[#include <check.h>],[void* t =
suite_create;])
echo "with_check = $with_check"
echo "HAVE_LIBCHECK = $HAVE_LIBCHECK"
--
Sylvain
- Re: The havelib module, (continued)
- Re: The havelib module, Simon Josefsson, 2009/02/06
- Re: The havelib module, Sylvain Beucler, 2009/02/07
- Re: The havelib module, Simon Josefsson, 2009/02/07
- Re: The havelib module, Sylvain Beucler, 2009/02/07
- Re: The havelib module, Simon Josefsson, 2009/02/07
- Re: The havelib module, Sylvain Beucler, 2009/02/07
- Re: The havelib module, Simon Josefsson, 2009/02/07
- Re: The havelib module, Eric Blake, 2009/02/07
- Re: The havelib module, Sylvain Beucler, 2009/02/07
- Re: The havelib module, Bruno Haible, 2009/02/08
- Re: The havelib module,
Sylvain Beucler <=
Re: The havelib module, Bruno Haible, 2009/02/08