Re: proposal: module 'accept4'

[Paolo Bonzini]

On 08/22/2009 11:39 PM, Bruno Haible wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Here's the proposed module for function 'accept4'.
>
> It does not define the macro SOCK_CLOEXEC. I think this macro should be
> replaced by a separate module, that would then also influence socket(),
> socketpair() - and what about connect()?
>
> Opinions? Objections?

This can be committed as is but it is not enough.  You have to always 
use a replacement (thus define the emulation as rpl_accept4) and check 
whether accept4 works at runtime (and similarly for pipe2) and fall back 
to accept+fcntl if it gives ENOSYS.

Paolo