[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: SIGNATURE_CHECK
From: |
Bruno Haible |
Subject: |
Re: SIGNATURE_CHECK |
Date: |
Thu, 24 Dec 2009 19:20:13 +0100 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.9 |
Eric Blake wrote:
> I'm pushing this.
I get this gcc warning, on Linux/glibc:
test-nanosleep.c:24: warning: 'struct timepec' declared inside parameter list
test-nanosleep.c:24: warning: its scope is only this definition or declaration,
which is probably not what you want
test-nanosleep.c:24: warning: initialization from incompatible pointer type
Bruno
- Re: new module 'unused-parameter', (continued)
- Re: stdlib tweak, Jim Meyering, 2009/12/23
- Re: stdlib tweak, Bruno Haible, 2009/12/23
- Re: stdlib tweak, Eric Blake, 2009/12/23
- Re: stdlib tweak, Eric Blake, 2009/12/23
- Re: ASSERT and SIGNATURE_CHECK macros, Bruno Haible, 2009/12/23
- Re: ASSERT and SIGNATURE_CHECK macros, Eric Blake, 2009/12/23
- Re: ASSERT and SIGNATURE_CHECK macros, Eric Blake, 2009/12/24
- Re: ASSERT and SIGNATURE_CHECK macros, Jim Meyering, 2009/12/24
- Re: SIGNATURE_CHECK,
Bruno Haible <=
- Re: SIGNATURE_CHECK, Eric Blake, 2009/12/24
- Re: SIGNATURE_CHECK, Bruno Haible, 2009/12/24
- Re: SIGNATURE_CHECK, Eric Blake, 2009/12/24
- Re: ASSERT macro, Bruno Haible, 2009/12/24
- SIZEOF macro (was: ASSERT macro), Eric Blake, 2009/12/24
- Re: SIZEOF macro, Eric Blake, 2009/12/24
- Re: SIZEOF macro, Jim Meyering, 2009/12/25
- Re: SIZEOF macro, Jim Meyering, 2009/12/25
- Re: SIZEOF macro, Ben Pfaff, 2009/12/24
- Re: SIZEOF macro, Bruno Haible, 2009/12/24