[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: new syntax-check rule for @acronym?

From: jemarch
Subject: Re: new syntax-check rule for @acronym?
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 21:44:35 +0100
User-agent: Wanderlust/2.14.0 (Africa) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.8 (Shij┼Ź) APEL/10.6 Emacs/23.1.91 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)

   > This hangs for non-GNU projects, like libvirt, that have no .texi
   > documentation.  We really need to make progress on the patch to refactor
   > maint.mk rules per Jose's ideas:
   > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2010-02/msg00242.html
   > which would conveniently fix this rule in the process.

   IMHO, the address@hidden rule belongs in an optionally-enabled class
   of tests.

Are you thinking about something like

   make syntax-check RULESET=gnu-strict

Would be nice to get maint.mk to include a local syntax.mk (if it
exists) provided by the maintainers where customized rules could be
defined making use of _sc_search_regexp.

But then, how to define the sets of rules?

Jose E. Marchesi  <address@hidden>
GNU Project       http://www.gnu.org

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]