[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: OpenBSD 4.7 vs nanosleep

From: Jim Meyering
Subject: Re: OpenBSD 4.7 vs nanosleep
Date: Fri, 08 Oct 2010 22:13:41 +0200

Bruno Haible wrote:
> Hi Jim,

Hi Bruno,

>> This isn't a show-stopper for the coreutils release.
> But it's easy to fix. The bug is actually in the gnulib replacement, which
> is missing a check on the validity of the argument.
> 2010-10-08  Bruno Haible  <address@hidden>
>       nanosleep: Make replacement POSIX compliant.
>       * lib/nanosleep.c (nanosleep): Return -1/EINVAL if the delay's tv_nsec
>       is out of range.
>       Reported by Jim Meyering.

I should have looked a little bit further ;-)
Thanks for the quick patch.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]