[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: libposix - is it done yet?

From: Ralf Wildenhues
Subject: Re: libposix - is it done yet?
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2010 07:04:10 +0200
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2010-08-04)

* Bruce Korb wrote on Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 02:59:04AM CEST:
> On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 3:34 PM, Bruno Haible wrote:
> > Bruce Korb wrote:
> >> Having looked
> >> through the module sources, there is no clear way of
> >> deriving the list of header macro names.
> > So you can recognize it through BUILT_SOURCES.
> >
> > $ for module in `./posix-modules`; do grep '^BUILT_SOURCES += \$(.*_H)$' 
> > modules/$module; done
> Just to be completely clear, the BUILT_SOURCES in Makefile.am is now
> overloaded.  Not only does it mean (to automake anyway) that the
> source gets built first, but also that it defines a header that is to
> be installed for libposix.

You could easily fix that by having a variable posix_headers, adding
headers there, and letting gnulib-tool add
  BUILT_SOURCES += $(posix_headers)

to save you duplication.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]