[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: glibc's snprintf is a pig; fix or replace ?
From: |
Bruce Korb |
Subject: |
Re: glibc's snprintf is a pig; fix or replace ? |
Date: |
Wed, 03 Nov 2010 13:09:22 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.12) Gecko/20100914 SUSE/3.0.8 Thunderbird/3.0.8 |
On 11/03/10 02:41, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
> I (and I believe others) would still like to see this happen, but as is
> usual for such things I believe the main thing holding it back is a lack
> of time from concerned parties, and overcoming the inertia to get it
> started. Your message adds another good reason to the list of why doing
> this would be useful...
Well, I may have a little time for it. Maybe I can polish it over
the next week or two. My ex-employer decided to rethink how to do
the software and just dumped half their staff, including me.
Pending next employment, I do have a little time.....but I'll likely look
at the libposix stuff first.
Cheers - Bruce
- glibc's snprintf is a pig; fix or replace ?, Jim Meyering, 2010/11/03
- Re: glibc's snprintf is a pig; fix or replace ?, Gary V. Vaughan, 2010/11/03
- Re: glibc's snprintf is a pig; fix or replace ?,
Bruce Korb <=
- Re: glibc's snprintf is a pig; fix or replace ?, Pádraig Brady, 2010/11/03
- Re: glibc's snprintf is a pig; fix or replace ?, Paolo Bonzini, 2010/11/03
- Re: glibc's snprintf is a pig; fix or replace ?, Jim Meyering, 2010/11/06
- Re: glibc's snprintf is a pig; fix or replace ?, Bruno Haible, 2010/11/18