[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: __GLIBC__ and uClibc
From: |
Mike Frysinger |
Subject: |
Re: __GLIBC__ and uClibc |
Date: |
Sat, 20 Nov 2010 13:27:53 -0500 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.13.5 (Linux/2.6.36; KDE/4.5.2; x86_64; ; ) |
On Saturday, November 20, 2010 13:15:48 Bruno Haible wrote:
> Mike Frysinger writes:
> > uclibc defines __GLIBC__
>
> More exactly, uClibc *usually* defines __GLIBC__, but not always.
you can say the same exact thing about glibc. uClibc defines it in the same
way -- via features.h. as for how features.h gets included is completely
arbitrary and varies from version to version. which is why you can only
assume __GLIBC__ definition if you've included features.h yourself.
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [PATCH] printf-parse: pull in features.h for __GLIBC__, Bruno Haible, 2010/11/20