[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: what happened to HAVE_STDBOOL_H

From: Eric Blake
Subject: Re: what happened to HAVE_STDBOOL_H
Date: Tue, 03 May 2011 16:44:37 -0600
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv: Gecko/20110428 Fedora/3.1.10-1.fc14 Lightning/1.0b3pre Mnenhy/0.8.3 Thunderbird/3.1.10

On 05/03/2011 04:34 PM, Sam Steingold wrote:
>> <stdbool.h> is not required by C89.  However, nothing else in gnulib
>> used the results of the test, and the idea is that if you are using
>> gnulib's stdbool module, you don't care about a fully
>> standards-compliant <stdbool.h>, rather you care about the subset of
>> <stdbool.h> guaranteed by gnulib.  So we trimmed the size of config.h
>> for the sake of emacs:
>> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2011-01/msg00571.html
> So, how do I know if gnulib created the file or not?

Use autoconf's AC_HEADER_STDBOOL, in addition to gl_INIT, if you still
want HAVE_STDBOOL_H defined.

Eric Blake   address@hidden    +1-801-349-2682
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]