[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: two semantics of fclose()

From: Bruno Haible
Subject: Re: two semantics of fclose()
Date: Fri, 6 May 2011 20:14:41 +0200
User-agent: KMail/1.9.9

Eric Blake wrote:
> >   lib/fflush.c - needs the permission of you, me, and Jim.
> >   lib/fpurge.c - needs the permission of you and me.
> > 
> > I agree to relax these two modules to LGPLv2+.
> As do I.

Jim Meyering wrote:
> Relaxing fflush.c to LGPLv2+ is fine with me.

OK, I've applied the license change. Eric, you can now let 'fclose' depend on

2011-05-06  Bruno Haible  <address@hidden>

        fflush, fpurge: Relicense under LGPLv2+.
        * modules/fflush (License): Change from LGPLv3+ to LGPLv2+.
        * modules/fpurge (License): Likewise.
        With permission from Eric Blake and Jim Meyering.
        Suggested by Eric Blake.

diff --git a/modules/fflush b/modules/fflush
index f1d696b..1d26b61 100644
--- a/modules/fflush
+++ b/modules/fflush
@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ Include:
 Eric Blake
diff --git a/modules/fpurge b/modules/fpurge
index ec11062..6cebcff 100644
--- a/modules/fpurge
+++ b/modules/fpurge
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ Include:
 Bruno Haible, Eric Blake

In memoriam Pim Fortuyn <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pim_Fortuyn>

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]