[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH 0/348] move AC_LIBOBJ invocations to the module descriptions
From: |
Bruno Haible |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH 0/348] move AC_LIBOBJ invocations to the module descriptions |
Date: |
Mon, 13 Jun 2011 13:43:04 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.9 |
Jim Meyering wrote:
> This looks like a fine improvement.
> I reviewed only the first dozen or so.
Thanks for the review. Most of the patches follow the same idiom.
> This new policy looks particularly easy to violate accidentally.
> What do you think about adding a syntax-check rule to help avoid that?
Yes, this would be good. I don't know how to write such a syntax-check
rule (it uses perl, right?). But I can tell you the file list to which it
should be applied. Namely, all m4/*.m4 files, except
close.m4
dprintf.m4
dup2.m4
faccessat.m4
fchdir.m4
fclose.m4
fcntl.m4
fprintf-posix.m4
open.m4
printf-posix.m4
snprintf.m4
sprintf-posix.m4
stdio_h.m4
vasnprintf.m4
vasprintf.m4
vdprintf.m4
vfprintf-posix.m4
vprintf-posix.m4
vsnprintf.m4
vsprintf-posix.m4
Bruno
--
In memoriam Anna Göldi <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anna_Göldi>
- [PATCH 0/348] move AC_LIBOBJ invocations to the module descriptions, Bruno Haible, 2011/06/06
- Re: [PATCH 0/348] move AC_LIBOBJ invocations to the module descriptions, Bruno Haible, 2011/06/15
- Re: [PATCH 0/348] move AC_LIBOBJ invocations to the module descriptions, Jim Meyering, 2011/06/16
- Re: [PATCH 0/348] move AC_LIBOBJ invocations to the module descriptions, Bruno Haible, 2011/06/16
- Re: [PATCH 0/348] move AC_LIBOBJ invocations to the module descriptions, Bruno Haible, 2011/06/16
- Re: [PATCH 0/348] move AC_LIBOBJ invocations to the module descriptions, Bruno Haible, 2011/06/16
- fprintftime dependencies, Bruno Haible, 2011/06/16
- Re: [PATCH 0/348] move AC_LIBOBJ invocations to the module descriptions, Tom G. Christensen, 2011/06/16