[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: msvc-inval: more options
From: |
Bastien ROUCARIES |
Subject: |
Re: msvc-inval: more options |
Date: |
Mon, 26 Sep 2011 11:14:09 +0200 |
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 11:06 AM, Paolo Bonzini <address@hidden> wrote:
> On 09/26/2011 11:01 AM, Bruno Haible wrote:
>>
>> Additionally, there's a legal problem here: Code like
>
> Stopped reading here. Do not include snippets, we _can_ do clean-room
> reverse engineering if necessary.
>
> We can also take code from Wine's MSVCRT implementation if need be, so that
> at least it is LGPL free software.
I agree wine has code. Thanks paolo
> Paolo
>
Re: msvc-inval: more options, Bruno Haible, 2011/09/27
- Re: msvc-inval: more options, Jim Meyering, 2011/09/28
- Re: msvc-inval: more options, Bruno Haible, 2011/09/28
- Re: msvc-inval: more options, Jim Meyering, 2011/09/28
- Re: msvc-inval: more options, Bruno Haible, 2011/09/28
- Re: msvc-inval: more options, Jim Meyering, 2011/09/28