[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Fwd: Getting AC_PROG_CC_C99
From: |
Paul Eggert |
Subject: |
Re: Fwd: Getting AC_PROG_CC_C99 |
Date: |
Wed, 28 Sep 2011 10:58:22 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.22) Gecko/20110906 Fedora/3.1.14-1.fc14 Thunderbird/3.1.14 |
On 09/28/11 09:45, Bruno Haible wrote:
> If the package's configure.ac already invokes AC_PROG_CC_STDC,
> early on (i.e. usually right after AC_PROG_CC), then gnulib's
> AC_REQUIRE([AC_PROG_CC_STDC])
> will be a no-op.
Ah, sorry, then we're fine as-is, since it's normal practice
to put the AC_PROG_CC_STDC before gl_EARLY. And nobody uses
the corresponding C99 or C89 macros, as far as I know (if they
do, they should switch to AC_PROG_CC_STDC anyway :-).
Autoconf should be fixed too, of course, but that's a longer-term
project.
- Fwd: Getting AC_PROG_CC_C99, Gary V. Vaughan, 2011/09/28
- Re: Fwd: Getting AC_PROG_CC_C99, Paul Eggert, 2011/09/28
- Re: Fwd: Getting AC_PROG_CC_C99, Bruno Haible, 2011/09/28
- Re: Fwd: Getting AC_PROG_CC_C99,
Paul Eggert <=
- Re: Getting AC_PROG_CC_C99, Gary V. Vaughan, 2011/09/29
- Re: Getting AC_PROG_CC_C99, Bruno Haible, 2011/09/29
- Re: Getting AC_PROG_CC_C99, Paul Eggert, 2011/09/29
- Re: Getting AC_PROG_CC_C99, Bruno Haible, 2011/09/30
- Re: Getting AC_PROG_CC_C99, Paul Eggert, 2011/09/30
- Re: Getting AC_PROG_CC_C99, Andrew W. Nosenko, 2011/09/30
- Re: Getting AC_PROG_CC_C99, Paul Eggert, 2011/09/30
- Re: Getting AC_PROG_CC_C99, Gary V. Vaughan, 2011/09/29
- Re: Getting AC_PROG_CC_C99, Bruno Haible, 2011/09/30
- Re: Getting AC_PROG_CC_C99, Gary V. Vaughan, 2011/09/30