[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: musl compatibility
From: |
Paolo Bonzini |
Subject: |
Re: musl compatibility |
Date: |
Tue, 12 Jun 2012 14:53:17 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120605 Thunderbird/13.0 |
Il 12/06/2012 14:14, Eric Blake ha scritto:
>> > While I agree with this, perhaps we can follow the suggestion and
>> > replace "if (freadahead (f))" with "if (freading(f) && !feof(f))" in
>> > closein.c.
> freading() is just as much an extension as freadahead(), but it might be
> an easier extension to implement.
musl has it, too.
Paolo
- musl compatibility, Reuben Thomas, 2012/06/07
- Re: musl compatibility, Pedro Alves, 2012/06/08
- Re: musl compatibility, Reuben Thomas, 2012/06/08
- Re: musl compatibility, Paolo Bonzini, 2012/06/12
- Re: musl compatibility, Paul Eggert, 2012/06/12
- Re: musl compatibility, Bruno Haible, 2012/06/17
- Re: musl compatibility, Paolo Bonzini, 2012/06/23
- Re: musl compatibility, Paul Eggert, 2012/06/23