Re: a ChangeLog typo and two sc_tight_scope fixes

[Jim Meyering]

On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 2:36 PM, Pádraig Brady <address@hidden> wrote:
> On 18/10/15 22:33, Pádraig Brady wrote:
>> On 18/10/15 05:04, Jim Meyering wrote:
>>> I've just pushed the following three patches:
>>
>> Nice. Note this improvement triggered new
>> syntax check failures on coreutils
>>
>>   $ make sc_tight_scope
>>   prog_fprintf
>>   rm
>>   defaultcon
>>   restorecon
>>   ...
>>
>> That's because the gnulib rule was working on an
>> invalid blank regular expression extracted from SOURCES,
>> thus effectively being ignored, as it was matching all
>> extern functions found with nm. with your added ^_?$
>> around the expression, this no longer happened, thus
>> triggering the above valid issues.
>>
>> I've sent a patch to coreutils to fix those,
>> and the attached gnulib patch is not strictly required
>> after your improvements, though it does remove some
>> extraneous unlikely to match expressions.
>
> correct patch attached this time

Thanks. Filtering out empty lines as well as anything
starting with "#" are fine changes.