[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: suggested feature: "date --debug" - print date parsing diagnostics
|
From: |
Assaf Gordon |
|
Subject: |
Re: suggested feature: "date --debug" - print date parsing diagnostics |
|
Date: |
Sun, 14 Aug 2016 21:36:17 -0400 |
> On Aug 12, 2016, at 04:37, Pádraig Brady <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> There's precedent for .....2() versions of functions, like renameat2() etc.
> How about we pass an unsigned int flags, instead of bool, in case we ever
> need to extend in future?
Attached a version with 'unsigned in flags' instead of 'bool debug'.
Comments very welcomed,
- assaf
parse-datetime-debug-2016-08-14.patch.xz
Description: Binary data
- Fwd: suggested feature: "date --debug" - print date parsing diagnostics, Pádraig Brady, 2016/08/09
- Re: Fwd: suggested feature: "date --debug" - print date parsing diagnostics, Paul Eggert, 2016/08/09
- Re: suggested feature: "date --debug" - print date parsing diagnostics, Assaf Gordon, 2016/08/10
- Re: suggested feature: "date --debug" - print date parsing diagnostics, Pádraig Brady, 2016/08/10
- Re: suggested feature: "date --debug" - print date parsing diagnostics, Assaf Gordon, 2016/08/11
- Re: suggested feature: "date --debug" - print date parsing diagnostics, Pádraig Brady, 2016/08/12
- Re: suggested feature: "date --debug" - print date parsing diagnostics,
Assaf Gordon <=
- Re: suggested feature: "date --debug" - print date parsing diagnostics, Pádraig Brady, 2016/08/19
- Re: suggested feature: "date --debug" - print date parsing diagnostics, Assaf Gordon, 2016/08/20
- Re: suggested feature: "date --debug" - print date parsing diagnostics, Jim Meyering, 2016/08/20