bug-gnulib
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [netcf-devel] netcf - anyone here for an "other operating system (bu


From: Michael Felt
Subject: Re: [netcf-devel] netcf - anyone here for an "other operating system (but not (Solaris))"
Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2016 12:47:03 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.0

On 01/11/2016 13:09, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Tue, Nov 01, 2016 at 11:55:12AM -0000, address@hidden wrote:
Granted - the web page is from 7 years ago (now that I look more closely).

How can I help ?

netcf is in its very early stages, and can be improved in any number of ways. 
The most pressing needs right now are

     implementing backends for other distributions (Debian, Ubuntu, etc.) and 
operating systems (Solaris)
     testing and using netcf

So, early stages is probably not correct anymore - and only including Solaris 
is not very inviting to the other UNIX - still out there (AIX).

My interest: cloud-init is looking at using netcf rather than ubuntu "interfaces" (man 5 
interfaces). I am working on a "distro" addin for AIX into cloud-init that will make 
trunk (the current one is very old, and would never merge into truck, so rewriting from scratch 
where needed and borrowing when possible)

So, will anyone pay attention if I take the time to download and try to build 
netcf for AIX?
The (outdated) docs are not intended to suggest exclusivity. Reviewers
would consider patches for any other OS on merits of the patch itself.

In the case of AIX, most people don't have access to such a system, so
we'd be relying on the submitter to have done all neccessary testing,
and also to periodically test that later patches to netcf don't
accidentally cause regressions.

IOW, by all means submit patches for AIX support, or any other OS

Regards,
Daniel

OK - restart.

a) git clone ...

b) edit bootstrap to remove indented 'sed' input and remove cp of bootstrap from gnulib

c) creating "configure" completes

d) current showstopper: readline
* I'll build and install readline; however, is it really necessary (most applications warn that it is not present - this is actually the first one I have come across that "requires" it. I was expecting something that - I thought - normally runs in the background - would not REQUIRE readline.

Is pkg-config required for run-time, or only for build/packaging?

Michael




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]