[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: af_alg benchmarks and performance
From: |
Bruno Haible |
Subject: |
Re: af_alg benchmarks and performance |
Date: |
Tue, 08 May 2018 15:29:24 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/5.1.3 (Linux/4.4.0-119-generic; KDE/5.18.0; x86_64; ; ) |
Hi Matteo,
> I see the same for PPC64 and S390X, in the time being I'll borrow two
> machines and provide tests on them.
When you test these, please can you also report the 'priority' that
/proc/crypto shows for these algorithms? I'm trying to find a reasonable
'priority' threshold for the afalg_buffer case.
Bruno
- Re: af_alg: Add ability to use Linux kernel crypto API on data in memory, (continued)
- af_alg benchmarks and performance, Bruno Haible, 2018/05/07
- Re: af_alg benchmarks and performance, Bruno Haible, 2018/05/07
- Re: af_alg benchmarks and performance, Paul Eggert, 2018/05/07
- Re: af_alg benchmarks and performance, Assaf Gordon, 2018/05/07
- Re: af_alg benchmarks and performance, Assaf Gordon, 2018/05/07
- Re: af_alg benchmarks and performance, Matteo Croce, 2018/05/08
- Re: af_alg benchmarks and performance,
Bruno Haible <=
- Re: af_alg benchmarks and performance, Matteo Croce, 2018/05/08
- Re: af_alg benchmarks and performance, Paul Eggert, 2018/05/09
- Re: af_alg benchmarks and performance, Matteo Croce, 2018/05/09
- Re: af_alg benchmarks and performance, Assaf Gordon, 2018/05/09
- Re: af_alg benchmarks and performance, Matteo Croce, 2018/05/12