Re: [PROPOSED] renameatu: rename from renameat2

[Paul Eggert]

Bruno Haible wrote:
> I would add a placeholder for the old module name,
> for a period of transition. So that users of the 'renameat2' module
> are not forced to migrate in a hurry, but instead can migrate when
> it is fit for their project and schedule.

In the past, we've often avoided such placeholders, as Gnulib is a source-code 
module and people can upgrade at their leisure. Since the app fixes are trivial, 
and since there's potential for trouble if apps had both Gnulib-placeholder and 
new-Glibc renameat2 implementations present, I'm somewhat inclined to avoid the 
placeholder.