[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: A new module: bitset
From: |
Akim Demaille |
Subject: |
Re: A new module: bitset |
Date: |
Wed, 28 Nov 2018 05:36:38 +0100 |
> Le 27 nov. 2018 à 21:31, Paul Eggert <address@hidden> a écrit :
>
> On 11/26/18 8:15 PM, Akim Demaille wrote:
>> The current implementation uses xmalloc, but there are also calls to calloc
>> and realloc.
>
> How can it be right to combine xmalloc with calloc/realloc?
I agree.
> Shouldn't the implementation use xmalloc, xcalloc, and xrealloc for
> consistency? Also, what about applications that don't want to use the x*
> variants?
What do you propose?
Re: A new module: bitset, Akim Demaille, 2018/11/25
Re: A new module: bitset, Paul Eggert, 2018/11/25