[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [RFC PATCH] test-c-stack2.sh: skip if the platform sent SIGILL on an
From: |
Ivan Zakharyaschev |
Subject: |
Re: [RFC PATCH] test-c-stack2.sh: skip if the platform sent SIGILL on an invalid address. |
Date: |
Sat, 29 Dec 2018 18:15:49 +0300 (MSK) |
User-agent: |
Alpine 2.20 (LFD 67 2015-01-07) |
Hi,
On Sat, 29 Dec 2018, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 28, 2018 at 05:23:09PM +0300, Ivan Zakharyaschev wrote:
> > As for the SIGILL peculiarity, it has a reason in the Elbrus architecture.
> No, this particular case (++*argv[argc]) has nothing to do with tagged memory,
> I hope Ivan will share his findings here.
I've done it.
Thanks for your hints regarding a test for another kind of fault (SIGFPE)
happenning speculatively, and regarding the hexadecimal values which are
easy to detect visually (0xbad etc.)!
--
Best regards,
Ivan
- Re: [RFC PATCH] test-c-stack2.sh: skip if the platform sent SIGILL on an invalid address., (continued)
- Re: [RFC PATCH] test-c-stack2.sh: skip if the platform sent SIGILL on an invalid address., Ivan Zakharyaschev, 2018/12/29
- Re: [RFC PATCH] test-c-stack2.sh: skip if the platform sent SIGILL on an invalid address., Dmitry V. Levin, 2018/12/29
- Re: [RFC PATCH] test-c-stack2.sh: skip if the platform sent SIGILL on an invalid address., Ivan Zakharyaschev, 2018/12/29
- Re: [RFC PATCH] test-c-stack2.sh: skip if the platform sent SIGILL on an invalid address., Bruno Haible, 2018/12/29
- Re: [RFC PATCH] test-c-stack2.sh: skip if the platform sent SIGILL on an invalid address., Bruno Haible, 2018/12/29
- Re: [RFC PATCH] test-c-stack2.sh: skip if the platform sent SIGILL on an invalid address., Dmitry V. Levin, 2018/12/29
- Re: [RFC PATCH] test-c-stack2.sh: skip if the platform sent SIGILL on an invalid address.,
Ivan Zakharyaschev <=