[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bug#34142: AddressSanitizer reported heap-buffer-overflow
From: |
Assaf Gordon |
Subject: |
Re: bug#34142: AddressSanitizer reported heap-buffer-overflow |
Date: |
Sun, 20 Jan 2019 02:15:08 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.4.0 |
(forwarding to gnulib)
Hello,
Hongxu Chen reported a heap-buffer-overflow in gnulib's regexec code.
It can be reproduced with current sed using:
git clone git://git.sv.gnu.org/sed.git
cd sed
./bootstrap && ./configure
make build-asan
echo 00000000000000000000000000 | ./sed/sed -E -e 's/(.*)*\1//'
The above 'sed' invocation is a simplified variation of Hongxu's report.
Details below:
On 2019-01-19 11:09 p.m., Hongxu Chen wrote:
=================================================================
==13920==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: heap-buffer-overflow on address
0x606000000233 at pc 0x0000004b4136 bp 0x7ffc475e3930 sp 0x7ffc475e30e0
READ of size 26 at 0x606000000233 thread T0
#0 0x4b4135 in __interceptor_memcmp.part.283
(/home/hongxu/FOT/sed-O0/install/bin/sed+0x4b4135)
#1 0x5b274c in proceed_next_node
/home/hongxu/FOT/sed-O0/./lib/regexec.c:1296:9
#2 0x597a4c in set_regs /home/hongxu/FOT/sed-O0/./lib/regexec.c:1453:18
#3 0x569a4f in re_search_internal
/home/hongxu/FOT/sed-O0/./lib/regexec.c:864:10
#4 0x56acd7 in re_search_stub
/home/hongxu/FOT/sed-O0/./lib/regexec.c:425:12
#5 0x56b061 in rpl_re_search
/home/hongxu/FOT/sed-O0/./lib/regexec.c:289:10
#6 0x52f572 in match_regex /home/hongxu/FOT/sed-O0/sed/regexp.c:358:11
#7 0x5292d1 in do_subst /home/hongxu/FOT/sed-O0/sed/execute.c:1015:8
#8 0x5233a2 in execute_program
/home/hongxu/FOT/sed-O0/sed/execute.c:1543:15
#9 0x520cba in process_files
/home/hongxu/FOT/sed-O0/sed/execute.c:1680:16
#10 0x5300dc in main /home/hongxu/FOT/sed-O0/sed/sed.c:382:17
#11 0x7f1dc2297b96 in __libc_start_main
/build/glibc-OTsEL5/glibc-2.27/csu/../csu/libc-start.c:310
#12 0x41b219 in _start
(/home/hongxu/FOT/sed-O0/install/bin/sed+0x41b219)
0x606000000233 is located 0 bytes to the right of 51-byte region
[0x606000000200,0x606000000233)
allocated by thread T0 here:
#0 0x4db0d0 in malloc (/home/hongxu/FOT/sed-O0/install/bin/sed+0x4db0d0)
#1 0x5624f4 in xmalloc /home/hongxu/FOT/sed-O0/lib/xmalloc.c:41:13
#2 0x5627c4 in xzalloc /home/hongxu/FOT/sed-O0/lib/xmalloc.c:86:18
#3 0x520e16 in line_init /home/hongxu/FOT/sed-O0/sed/execute.c:281:15
#4 0x5209ad in process_files
/home/hongxu/FOT/sed-O0/sed/execute.c:1654:3
#5 0x5300dc in main /home/hongxu/FOT/sed-O0/sed/sed.c:382:17
#6 0x7f1dc2297b96 in __libc_start_main
/build/glibc-OTsEL5/glibc-2.27/csu/../csu/libc-start.c:310
SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: heap-buffer-overflow
(/home/hongxu/FOT/sed-O0/install/bin/sed+0x4b4135) in
__interceptor_memcmp.part.283
Shadow bytes around the buggy address:
0x0c0c7fff7ff0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
0x0c0c7fff8000: fa fa fa fa fd fd fd fd fd fd fd fa fa fa fa fa
0x0c0c7fff8010: fd fd fd fd fd fd fd fa fa fa fa fa fd fd fd fd
0x0c0c7fff8020: fd fd fd fd fa fa fa fa fd fd fd fd fd fd fd fa
0x0c0c7fff8030: fa fa fa fa fd fd fd fd fd fd fd fa fa fa fa fa
=>0x0c0c7fff8040: 00 00 00 00 00 00[03]fa fa fa fa fa 00 00 00 00
0x0c0c7fff8050: 00 00 03 fa fa fa fa fa 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
0x0c0c7fff8060: fa fa fa fa fd fd fd fd fd fd fd fa fa fa fa fa
0x0c0c7fff8070: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 fa fa fa fa fa 00 00 00 00
0x0c0c7fff8080: 00 00 00 fa fa fa fa fa fd fd fd fd fd fd fd fd
0x0c0c7fff8090: fa fa fa fa 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 fa fa fa fa
Shadow byte legend (one shadow byte represents 8 application bytes):
Addressable: 00
Partially addressable: 01 02 03 04 05 06 07
Heap left redzone: fa
Freed heap region: fd
Stack left redzone: f1
Stack mid redzone: f2
Stack right redzone: f3
Stack after return: f5
Stack use after scope: f8
Global redzone: f9
Global init order: f6
Poisoned by user: f7
Container overflow: fc
Array cookie: ac
Intra object redzone: bb
ASan internal: fe
Left alloca redzone: ca
Right alloca redzone: cb
==13920==ABORTING
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Re: bug#34142: AddressSanitizer reported heap-buffer-overflow,
Assaf Gordon <=