[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: dfa MT-safe?
From: |
arnold |
Subject: |
Re: dfa MT-safe? |
Date: |
Sun, 15 Dec 2019 01:38:13 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Heirloom mailx 12.5 7/5/10 |
On 12/14/19 3:43 AM, Bruno Haible wrote:
> > If the 'dfa' module supposed to be multithread-safe?
Paul Eggert <address@hidden> wrote:
> Yes it is supposed to be.
News to me.
In any case, gawk's use of it is (and will remain) single-threaded.
It'd be nice if your fix did not pull in more libraries, like libpthread
or whatever, since that would considerably complicate things for me,
for no actual gain w.r.t. gawk.
I'm curious what is the use case for multithreaded dfa?
Thanks,
Arnold
- dfa MT-safe?, Bruno Haible, 2019/12/14
- Re: dfa MT-safe?, Paul Eggert, 2019/12/14
- Re: dfa MT-safe?, Bruno Haible, 2019/12/14
- Re: dfa MT-safe?,
arnold <=
- Re: dfa MT-safe?, Bruno Haible, 2019/12/15
- Re: dfa MT-safe?, arnold, 2019/12/15
- Re: dfa MT-safe?, Norihiro Tanaka, 2019/12/15
- Re: dfa MT-safe?, Paul Eggert, 2019/12/16
- Re: dfa MT-safe?, arnold, 2019/12/16