[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Missing dependency on progname

From: Reuben Thomas
Subject: Re: Missing dependency on progname
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2020 22:42:28 +0100

On Mon, 30 Dec 2013 at 09:28, Reuben Thomas <address@hidden> wrote:
On 30 December 2013 08:18, Reuben Thomas <address@hidden> wrote:

On 30 December 2013 01:20, Paul Eggert <address@hidden> wrote:
Reuben Thomas wrote:
It's been drawn to my attention that under some circumstances, gnulib fails
to include progname when it's needed

That's documented here:


Thanks. Could it be documented in a warning message (either produced by gnulib-tool or at compile time)? The way it fails gives no reason to suspect it's not a bug.

Come to that, it's a pity to impose this on users who haven't told gnulib not to include GPL'ed modules. Or is it not possible to LGPL progname?

I just ran into this again. Would it be possible to LGPL progname?

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]