[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: fts: Document this module

From: Bruno Haible
Subject: Re: fts: Document this module
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2023 00:41:47 +0100

> The gnulib fts is different from glibc API, and they can return
> different results when called the same way.  See end of earlier thread
> here:
> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2021-07/msg00070.html

Thanks for the heads-up, Simon.

> I'm not sure what could be done.  Perhaps adding a sentence to the
> gnulib documentation stating that the gnulib fts is not a drop-in
> replacement for missing fts functionality but a separate implementation
> with different behaviour.

I'm not sure about what to write either. Jim or Paul, what should we state
— either in the 'fts' module description, or in the .texi documentation?


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]