[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Gnulib and nullptr
From: |
Bruno Haible |
Subject: |
Re: Gnulib and nullptr |
Date: |
Mon, 06 Feb 2023 12:19:09 +0100 |
Paul Eggert wrote:
> > Why call it 'c-nullptr', not 'nullptr'?
>
> I was worried about C++, not that I know much about it, and operated by
> analogy with the name of m4/c-bool.m4.
OK, I see. So the prefix 'c-' in 'c-bool' and 'c-nullptr' means something
like "ISO C standard compliant". We could also have been using a prefix
'std-' maybe. Anyway, it's OK; it just wasn't immediately clear to me.
Bruno
- Re: Gnulib and nullptr, (continued)
- Re: Gnulib and nullptr, Paul Eggert, 2023/02/06
- Re: Gnulib and nullptr, Bruno Haible, 2023/02/06
- Re: Gnulib and nullptr, Paul Eggert, 2023/02/06
- Re: Gnulib and nullptr, Paul Eggert, 2023/02/07
- Re: Gnulib and nullptr, Bruno Haible, 2023/02/08
- Re: Gnulib and nullptr (and m4_provide_if), Paul Eggert, 2023/02/08
- Re: Gnulib and nullptr (and m4_provide_if), Akim Demaille, 2023/02/12
Re: Gnulib and nullptr, Bruno Haible, 2023/02/05
Re: Gnulib and nullptr, Bruno Haible, 2023/02/05