bug-gnulib
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: gnulib-tool.py: Omit some unnecessary list() calls around sorted().


From: Bruno Haible
Subject: Re: gnulib-tool.py: Omit some unnecessary list() calls around sorted().
Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2024 21:05:59 +0200

Hi Collin,

> I was having a look at GLModuleSystem.py and noticed some duplicate
> checks that an key is valid. Patch 0003 addresses that.
> 
> Patch 0004 adds a missing None return type hint to
> GLModuleTable.getCondition(). This is used to indicate that the module
> is not a conditional dependency. I missed this in the type hint patch.

Looks good. Both patches applied.

> > * In GLModuleSystem.py lines 784, 821:
> >   A condition can be a string or True. But
> >      str | bool
> >    makes it look like False was also a valid value. Is possible to
> >    write
> >      str | True
> >    in some way?
> 
> The correct way to do this is Literal[True] after the import:
> 
>     from typing import Literal
> 
> but I wasn't sure if it was compatible with Python 3.7. I ended up
> trying it and it is compatible with Python 3.7. The documentation says
> Python 3.8 which I've confirmed with my installation [1].

OK; if it's not valid syntax in Python 3.7 then we can't use it (or
use it only in comments).

> Here is the thread we chose Python 3.7:
> 
>     https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2024-03/msg00004.html
> 
> It appears it is EOL but I'm not sure how RHEL / CentOS versions and
> packages work [2]. Does the next version default to 3.7? It looks like
> they ship a few and allow you to use 'alternatives --set', but I am
> unsure which is default.

I'm not willing to open this discussion of minimum Python version again
now (barring new arguments). We have considered everything, then made
a decision; now let's stick to that decision. We can revisit this in
two years.

Bruno






reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]