[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: beta-tester call draft
From: |
Bruno Haible |
Subject: |
Re: beta-tester call draft |
Date: |
Sun, 21 Apr 2024 01:14:12 +0200 |
Paul Eggert wrote:
> I hope we can drop the sh implementation at the first opportunity -
> which would be after we've tested the Python implementation enough, and
> when we want to add some features and it's a pain to add them to both sh
> and Python.
Of course it's a pain to maintain two implementations in parallel.
But we need to give the developers a bit of slack, so that they have time to
- install Python on their development machines,
- update their continuous integration recipes accordingly.
Bruno
- Re: beta-tester call draft, (continued)
Re: beta-tester call draft, Pádraig Brady, 2024/04/20
Re: beta-tester call draft, Bernhard Voelker, 2024/04/20
- Re: beta-tester call draft, Bruno Haible, 2024/04/20
- Re: beta-tester call draft, Paul Eggert, 2024/04/20
- Re: beta-tester call draft,
Bruno Haible <=
- Re: beta-tester call draft, Bernhard Voelker, 2024/04/21
- Re: future Python evolution, Bruno Haible, 2024/04/21
- Re: future Python evolution, Paul Eggert, 2024/04/21
- Re: future Python evolution, Bruno Haible, 2024/04/21
- Re: future Python evolution, Paul Eggert, 2024/04/22
Re: future Python evolution, Bernhard Voelker, 2024/04/21
Re: future Python evolution, Bernhard Voelker, 2024/04/28
Re: beta-tester call draft, Janneke Nieuwenhuizen, 2024/04/21
Re: full-source bootstrap and Python, Bruno Haible, 2024/04/21
Re: full-source bootstrap and Python, Simon Josefsson, 2024/04/22