Re: diffutils __pycache_

bug-gnulib

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: diffutils pycache failure.

From:	Bruno Haible
Subject:	Re: diffutils __pycache__ failure.
Date:	Mon, 22 Apr 2024 13:38:11 +0200

Collin Funk wrote:
> I have no clue if this has a noticeable performance impact or not.

Can you measure it, please? For example, with
  GNULIB_TOOL_IMPL=py time ./test-all.sh

I measure a difference in the 2% range, but it's not clear to me whether
-B slows down or speeds up things :)

Bruno

[Prev in Thread]

Current Thread

[Next in Thread]

GNU gnulib: calling for beta-testers, Bruno Haible, 2024/04/21
- Re: GNU gnulib: calling for beta-testers, Vivien Kraus, 2024/04/21
- Re: GNU gnulib: calling for beta-testers, Paul Eggert, 2024/04/22
  - Re: GNU gnulib: calling for beta-testers, Collin Funk, 2024/04/22
    - diffutils __pycache__ failure., Collin Funk, 2024/04/22
    - Re: diffutils __pycache__ failure., Bruno Haible <=
    - Re: diffutils __pycache__ failure., Collin Funk, 2024/04/22
    - Re: diffutils __pycache__ failure., Bruno Haible, 2024/04/22
    - Re: GNU gnulib: calling for beta-testers, Bruno Haible, 2024/04/22
    - Re: GNU gnulib: calling for beta-testers, Collin Funk, 2024/04/22
    - Re: GNU gnulib: calling for beta-testers, Bruno Haible, 2024/04/22
- Re: GNU gnulib: calling for beta-testers, Bruno Haible, 2024/04/21
  - Re: GNU gnulib: calling for beta-testers, Paul Eggert, 2024/04/22
    - Re: GNU gnulib: calling for beta-testers, Mohammad Akhlaghi, 2024/04/22

Prev by Date: Re: full-source bootstrap and Python
Next by Date: Re: printf functions without INT_MAX limitation
Previous by thread: diffutils __pycache__ failure.
Next by thread: Re: diffutils __pycache__ failure.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Re: diffutils __pycache__ failure.

Re: diffutils pycache failure.