[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Gnulib in Debian
From: |
Bruno Haible |
Subject: |
Re: Gnulib in Debian |
Date: |
Wed, 24 Apr 2024 01:51:19 +0200 |
Reuben Thomas wrote:
> (not yet in Debian, sadly, as they don't like me "vendoring gnulib", as FTP
> Master calls it, or "using gnulib as other packages like Enchant do, and as
> designed", as I call it).
I assume you are alluding to the mail thread that starts at
<https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2022/11/msg00110.html> ?
I haven't read the thread. But you write:
"I am the upstream maintainer of libpaper ..., and also a Debian Maintainer
trying to get a new version of libpaper into Debian."
Is the problem something that affects the package upstream, or only something
that is specific to Debian?
In the latter case, I don't want to interfere with that. Distros package the
software like they want to. Debian, in particular, has hundreds of pages of
policy documents. It's not my business as an upstream maintainer to interfere
with that. (*)
Bruno
(*) Except when there's a copyright infringement, like it happened in the
Oracle Solaris downstream distribution of GNU libsigsegv. I had to write them,
so they stopped doing that.
- 'relocatable' project built without --enable-relocatable, Reuben Thomas, 2024/04/23
- Re: Gnulib in Debian,
Bruno Haible <=
- Re: Gnulib in Debian, Reuben Thomas, 2024/04/24
- Re: Gnulib in Debian, Simon Josefsson, 2024/04/24
- Re: Gnulib in Debian, Reuben Thomas, 2024/04/24
- Re: GNULIB_REVISION, Bruno Haible, 2024/04/25
- Re: GNULIB_REVISION, Simon Josefsson, 2024/04/25
- Re: GNULIB_REVISION, Paul Eggert, 2024/04/25
- Re: GNULIB_REVISION, Simon Josefsson, 2024/04/25
- Re: GNULIB_REVISION, Paul Eggert, 2024/04/25
- Re: GNULIB_REVISION, Collin Funk, 2024/04/25