[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GNULIB_REVISION
From: |
Collin Funk |
Subject: |
Re: GNULIB_REVISION |
Date: |
Thu, 25 Apr 2024 10:48:10 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla Thunderbird |
On 4/25/24 10:00 AM, Paul Eggert wrote:
> Is there some way to cajole 'git clone' into using less memory, with a
> '--depth 1' or similar options? Cloning shallowly would clone Gnulib a
> lot faster, if you're cloning from a remote repository.
Maybe '--single-branch' would help too. If space is really desperate
the snapshots on gitweb are pretty small.
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=gnulib.git;a=commit;h=648aeb575db7af9ddd51cf17d1b56ee91e9ef3c5
7.6 MB for me vs. my full clone
$ du -s --human-readable .git
114M .git
Collin
- Re: 'relocatable' project built without --enable-relocatable, (continued)
- Re: 'relocatable' project built without --enable-relocatable, Reuben Thomas, 2024/04/25
- Re: Gnulib in Debian, Bruno Haible, 2024/04/23
- Re: Gnulib in Debian, Reuben Thomas, 2024/04/24
- Re: Gnulib in Debian, Simon Josefsson, 2024/04/24
- Re: Gnulib in Debian, Reuben Thomas, 2024/04/24
- Re: GNULIB_REVISION, Bruno Haible, 2024/04/25
- Re: GNULIB_REVISION, Simon Josefsson, 2024/04/25
- Re: GNULIB_REVISION, Paul Eggert, 2024/04/25
- Re: GNULIB_REVISION, Simon Josefsson, 2024/04/25
- Re: GNULIB_REVISION, Paul Eggert, 2024/04/25
- Re: GNULIB_REVISION,
Collin Funk <=